Non-verbal Vocalisations - the Case of Laughter Jürgen Trouvain Institute of Phonetics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany trouvain@coli.uni-sb.de The most frequently used form of communication between humans is conversation consisting of both speech as verbal vocalisation and non-verbal vocalisations. The question addressed here is how non-verbal vocalisation such as laughter differs from speech articulation. Data inspections to be presented here give an idea how laughter is integrated in every-day speech as a unique signalling system in non-verbal as well as verbal vocalisations. In dialogues, many features are transmitted by paralinguistic vocal parameters such as pitch range, intensity and speech tempo. In addition to these prosodic properties, which modify the articulation of verbal material, there are the less well-studied non-verbal vocalisations. These include e.g. backchannel-utterances (indispensible for dialogues), filled pauses (frequent in spontaneous speech), and affective interjective calls which are produced by speakers and hearers for attitudinal and emotional signalling. The observation of laughter-like calls in apes and monkeys (e.g. Preuschoft, 1992) led to a debate whether only humans laugh. In contrast to non-human primates, the situations in which humans laugh during speech show a great range: mirth and joy, humour, malice, embarrassment, and even despair. Likewise, human laughter does not show just one form but a great repertoire of different kinds of laughter. Bachorowski et al. (2001), e.g., divide laughter in song-like, snort-like and grunt-like types. Further forms are speech-laughs (Nwokah et al., 1999) which are produced simultaneously to speech. Trouvain (2001) found in a German dialogue database that most laughing events occur during articulation of lexical items, not as vocalisations of their own. However, the production of laughter is clearly distinct from speech production. Although the consonant-vowel pattern in laughter (cf. lexicalised "haha", "ahah", "xaxa") superficially resembles speech, the control for respiration, phonation and articulation is much simpler. A typical voiced laugh combines a simple exhalation muscle command with a "program" for voiced-unvoiced alternations. This pattern is highly rhythmic but with a timing pattern completely different to phonologically comparable ones in speech. In contrast, speech-laughs are nested in the articulatory processes of segments: the stronger aspiration typically occurs in aspirated parts just as the voice vibrato appears in voiced segment portions. References: Bachorowski, J.-A., Smoski, M.J. & Owren, M.J. (2001). The acoustic features of human laughter. Journal of theAcoustical Society America 111 (3), pp. 1582-1597. Nwokah, E.E., Hsu, H.-C., Davies, P. & Fogel, A. (1999). The integration of laughter and speech in vocal communication: a dynamic systems perspective. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 42, pp. 880-894. Preuschoft, S. (1992). "Laughter" and "smile" in Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Ethology 91, pp. 220-239. Trouvain, J. (2001). Phonetic aspects of "speech-laughs". Proc. Conf. Orality & Gestuality (Orage), June 2001, Aix-en-Provence, pp. 634-639.