Course: Computational Modelling of Linguistic Processes
LI0057 Computational Modelling of Linguistic Processes
(Also known as
COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS 2
Half course)
Prerequisites
A good background in Artificial Intelligence
(e.g. AI 2) or Cognitive Science (e.g. the Intro to Cognitive Science
Honours option) would be a definite advantage in this course.
To take this course, you do not need to have
taken Computational Linguistics 1.
Content and teaching
The course will explore two related
themes: - Major theme: Connectionist (neural
net) modelling of language processes (weeks 1-8)
- Minor theme:
Computational models of the evolution of recursive language (weeks
7-10).
(Weeks 7 and 8 are an overlap between the two
themes.)
The course will involve extensive essential reading. The usual weekly
pattern will be:
- Lecture introducing topic and reading.
- Tutorial discussion of reading.
It is essential that students read the week's assigned reading before
the Friday tutorial.
In addition, there will be an introduction to practical exploration of a
package for running neural net simulations (XERION).
Apart from the practical work with a neural net package, the course will
have no taught practical component. But students will be encouraged to
use their own computational expertise to write small programs exploring
various aspects of the issues raised by the reading.
Instructors
The course will be taught by Prof. J Hurford, with occasional
participation by research associates currently working in this
field. These associates
are also willing to supervise coursework projects for this course (see below).
Assessment
Assessment will be entirely by project(s), as follows:
- EITHER ONE
- report of about 4000 words (or involving equivalent
work in programming or experiment),
- OR TWO
- reports of about 2000 words each (or involving equivalent
work in programming or experiment).
A ``report'' may be
- EITHER
- an essay critically surveying and comparing at least two
(for a 2000-word report) or three (for a 4000-word report) of the works
studied,
- OR
- a description of a small computational experiment
designed to test, (in)validate, or otherwise throw light on, one or more of the
works read.
Students have a free choice within these options, but are advised to
negotiate their choices early with me (Jim Hurford).
The deadline for the first report of two will be the
end of Week 6, and
the deadline for the second report of two, or the single `big' report
will be the first day of the following term).
Weekly Readings
- Bechtel, William, and Adele Abrahamsen, 1991 Connectionism
and the Mind: an Introduction to Parallel Processing in Networks,
Blackwells, Oxford. (Hereafter `B&A') Chapters 1 and 2, pp.1-65.
- B&A Chapters 3 and 5, pp.66-105, 147-175.
- B&A Chapter 6, pp.175-210. and Rumelhart, David E., and James
L.McClelland, 1986 ``On Learning
the Past Tenses of English Verbs'', in Parallel Distributed
Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol.2,
Psychological and Biological Models, ed by James L.McClelland and David
E.Rumelhart, MIT Press, 216-271.
- Pinker, S and Prince, A. 1988 ``On language and connectionism:
Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language
acquisition'', Cognition, 28:73-193.
- Fodor, J.A. and Pylyshyn, Z.W. 1988 ``Connectionism and cognitive
architecture: a critical analysis'', Cognition, 28:3-71.
- Elman, Jeffrey L., 1993 ``Learning and development in neural
networks: the importance of starting small'' Cognition, 48:71-99.
- Batali, John, 1994 ``Innate Biases and Critical Periods:
Combining
Evolution and Learning in the Acquisition of Syntax''. In
Artificial Life VI, ed. by Rodney Brooks and Pattie Maes, MIT Press,
160-171. and Christiansen, Morten, and Devlin, Joseph, 1997 ``Recursive
inconsistencies are hard to learn: a connectionist perspective on
universal word order correlations.'' In Proceedings of the 19th
Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, 113-118, Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
- Batali, John, 1998 ``Computational Simulations of the
Emergence of Grammar'', In Approaches to the Evolution of language:
Social and cognitive bases, edited by James R Hurford,
Chris Knight and Michael Studdert-Kennedy, Cambridge University Press, 405-426.
- Kirby, Simon, forthcoming, ``Learning, bottlenecks and the
evolution of recursive syntax'', and Hurford, James R, forthcoming
``Social transmission favours linguistic generalization'', both to
appear in Approaches to the evolution of language: the emergence of
phonology and syntax, edited by Chris Knight, Michael Studdert-Kennedy
and James R Hurford, Cambridge University Press.
- Batali, John, forthcoming, ``The negotiation and acquisition of
recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars'', to
appear in Linguistic evolution through language acquisition: formal
and
computational models, edited by Ted Briscoe, Cambridge University Press.